Skip to content

Select your location.

It looks like your location does not match the site. We think you may prefer a ClientEarth site which has content specific to your location. Select the site you'd like to visit below.

English (USA)

Location successfully changed to English (Global)

Follow us

Support us Opens in a new window Donate
Return to mob menu

Search the site

EUTR | 3 August 2018

Comparison of illegal logging laws in the EU, the US, Australia and Japan
EUTR
Forests
Forests & trade

PDF | 484 kb

Download Item

Comparison of illegal logging laws in the EU, the US, Australia and Japan

Also available in French, Chinese, and Japanese

As major timber consuming markets, the EU, US, Australia, and most recently, Japan, have all introduced laws to restrict the access of illegally harvested timber to their markets. While the laws are essentially addressing the same issue, there are some important differences.

ClientEarth has developed a short comparison table with key information on the Japanese Clean Wood Act, EU Timber Regulation, US Lacey Act and Australian Illegal Logging Prohibition Regulation. This overview of the four import regulations may be particularly helpful for timber operators to better understand the different requirements of the laws in each jurisdiction.