hand with crops for story saying illegal and dangerous edocrine disruptor definition approved

Illegal and dangerous endocrine disruptor criteria approved

Expert scientists from most EU countries today approved the European Commission’s proposed criteria to identify which pesticide chemicals may be hormone disruptors. These criteria threaten human health and the environment and – because they overstep the Commission’s powers – are illegal.

These criteria were supposed to be purely scientific, to define what evidence is necessary to identify a chemical as an endocrine disruptor. However, the debate became political because the pesticides industry refused to accept the existing ban of endocrine disruptors in their products under the Pesticides Regulation.

After a year of negotiations, Member States caved in. The criteria – despite changes – still impose a too hard-to-meet burden of proof. They are also unclear, which means there will be more debates what they actually mean and thus more delays in banning these chemicals in pesticides and elsewhere.

ClientEarth lawyer Alice Bernard said: “These EDC criteria were supposed to be grounded in science, and to identify which chemicals are hormone disrupting. Instead, the criteria let industry ‘de-identify’ a chemical as endocrine disruptor, if, for example, it is a pesticide that is meant to be an endocrine disruptor for targeted species.

“This allows businesses to use and sell endocrine disrupting pesticides in contradiction with the ban established by the European Parliament and the Council in 2009. In other words, the Commission is exceeding its legal mandate. We call on the European Parliament to veto these criteria, to protect people and the planet.”

What is more, these criteria were designed to identify endocrine disruptors in pesticides only. By failing to propose criteria which would be applicable across all sectors – from cosmetics to toy manufacturing and more – today’s vote creates a silo approach.

This will further delay action to protect human health and the environment against hormone-disrupting chemicals, and breach the obligation of the EU to ensure a high level of protection of human health and the environment. This is also in contradiction with the 7th Environment Action Programme.

Read ClientEarth’s report: Disrupted Criteria – The criteria to identify endocrine disruptors: implications beyond pesticides and biocides

Share this...
Share on Facebook! Tweet this! Share on LinkedIn! Email!

Pixabay

Related articles

More from

  • paint

    Commission to face EU Court over authorisation of lead chromate in paint

    The European Commission is facing a second court challenge for allowing a Canadian company to sell two dangerous chemicals used for road markings in the EU.

  • paris

    Highest legal authority in France orders government to clean up air pollution

    France’s highest legal authority has ordered the French government to produce plans within nine months to clean up the country’s illegal air pollution.

  • mountains around Zakopane

    Court rules Polish tourist destination’s clean air fee is illegal

    A Polish spa town and tourist favourite has been illegally charging visitors an environmental fee while flouting air quality standards.

  • View of smog from Primrose Hill, London

    High Court judgment on air pollution a “shot across the bows” of government

    Environmental lawyers ClientEarth have said today that a High Court judgment on air pollution is a “shot across the bows of the government”. 

  • Follow us

    Newsletters

    Get our regular email newsletters, they contain the latest updates on our work as well as features and articles about environmental issues, science and politics.