Skyscpaers reflected in ice at night

Rule of law shunned as CETA deal approved in European Parliament

MEPs have voted through the EU’s trade deal with Canada, CETA, without seeking the opinion of the European Court of Justice on one of the most controversial elements of the deal.

The European Parliament has approved the trade deal this afternoon, marking the beginning of the ratification process of CETA in the EU.

ClientEarth trade and environment lawyer Laurens Ankersmit said:

“We are disappointed the European Parliament has decided to consent to CETA so hastily, without due regard for the rule of law. The Investment Court System poses fundamental challenges to the EU’s legal system and should have been checked by the European Court of Justice before the vote.”

“By signing off CETA, the European Parliament has placed a greater value in business interests than a commitment to the rule of law.”

CETA gives investors significant rights under the Investment Court System (ICS) that may undermine rule of law in the EU and the powers of EU judges – including judges in the Member States. These rights could threaten the power and ability of national governments’ to make environmental laws.

The European Court of Justice (ECJ) is due to consider the legality of the ICS in CETA under EU law, after the Walloon parliament made this a condition of ratifying the trade deal.

CETA is the EU’s most comprehensive trade deal to date. With other trade agreements on the horizon, today’s vote not only shuns the EU’s judiciary but also highlights the inadequacies of the EU’s trade policy.

The EU’s attempts to include environmental provisions in the trade deal – CETA’s ‘environment chapter’ – do little to benefit people or the planet. Instead, CETA prioritises corporate interests undermining any claims that this deal is a ‘gold standard’ in trade.

Ankersmit added:

“The Commission prides itself on having a trade policy ‘based on values’. Unfortunately, CETA is not a progressive agreement. It offers businesses a great deal, including the ability to sue governments without any strings attached. There are no obligations for investors, the commitments in the environmental chapter are not enforceable and the exceptions clauses necessary to safeguard decision-making in the public interest are completely outdated.”

ClientEarth’s legal analysis shone light on the incompatibility of ICS with EU law. We asked MEPs not to vote for CETA. Now, the EU must take the concerns of citizens seriously and work towards a fair and sustainable trade agreement for all.

ClientEarth will continue to follow CETA as national parliaments begin to ratify the deal in the coming years.

Share this...
Share on Facebook! Tweet this! Share on LinkedIn! Email!

Robert Snache

Related articles

More from

  • palm tree silhouette lights

    Top insurers pull billions from coal – lawyers say there are “serious questions” for those still invested in it

    This week, insurance giant Zurich announced that it would both divest from and stop insuring coal-dependent businesses. ClientEarth lawyer Alice Garton questions why others are lagging behind.

  • scarlet cloud sunset over dark landscape

    Lawyer to faith investors: “never has your voice been needed more”

    Given the climate-intensified destruction present in so many continents today, faith leaders must question their investments in fossil fuels.

  • fragment-pattern-red-railing-staircase

    Investors haul mining giant BHP over coals on “climate hypocrisy” at AGM

    Membership fees to policy-obstructive lobby groups betray investor confidence, say lawyers.

  • mountain climbers

    Financial regulator failures increase investor risk

    The Financial Reporting Council’s failure to enforce climate risk corporate reporting laws has serious implications for investors.

  • Follow us

    You can help

    Your support helps us use the law to protect your environment.