bird flying

Regional Spanish government authorised illegal emissions, court rules

The Supreme Court of Asturias, in north west Spain, has ruled the regional government allowed a power plant to operate on an illegal permit, after a legal challenge from ClientEarth’s Spanish partners, IIDMA.

The judgment forces the Government of Asturias to modify the permit given to the coal-fired power station Soto de Ribera giving it tougher emission limits for sulphur dioxide, nitrogen oxides and dust.

The Asturias government had approved a permit for the plant which allowed it to emit more of these pollutants than was allowed under the Directive.

The judgment upholds the rules laid out by the EU Industrial Emissions Directive (IED), which sets limits on the levels of harmful pollutants that industrial installations like power stations can pump out.

Important Decision

ClientEarth lawyer Sam Bright said: “This is an important decision, which will start alarm bells ringing with other regional governments in Spain that failed to update coal plant permits to reflect the new emissions limits.

“Governments must make sure the rules are followed. It’s their job to protect us from breathing harmful levels of pollution and to protect our environment.”

IIDMA also provided scientific evidence to the court on the high levels of mercury in soil near the Soto de Ribera coal plant.

Exposure to mercury can cause serious health problems, such as respiratory, cardiovascular and neurological diseases. Based on this evidence, IIDMA asked the Supreme Court of Asturias to include emission limits for mercury in the plant’s permit as required by the IED.

However, the court dismissed this argument and IIDMA will appeal this point to the Supreme Court of Spain.

The plant also discharges its waste water into a river which is designated as a special area of conservation included in the EU’s Natura 2000 network.

According to the EU Habitats Directive and further Spanish legislation, Soto’s permit should include measures to avoid habitat deterioration and disruptions that may affect the animals there, such as salmon. This was another argument put forward by IIDMA but finally dismissed by the Court. IIDMA will also appeal this.


Share this...
Share on Facebook! Tweet this! Share on LinkedIn! Email!

Adrián Metasboc

Related articles

More from or

  • turbine against autumn treeline

    Wind and solar will be cheaper than burning wood for power by 2020 – report

    Environmental lawyers ClientEarth are calling for an end to subsidies to wood-burning facilities like Drax.

  • bird flying

    Regional Spanish government authorised illegal emissions, court rules

    The Supreme Court of Asturias, in north west Spain, rules that a power plant was allowed an illegal permit and pumped out excess harmful pollutants.

  • warm colour spanish peaks hillside

    Spain’s funding of power plants faces legal challenge

    Spanish electricity companies may have to pay back over €3bn in aid if environmental lawyers’ complaint over the capacity mechanism is successful.

  • nuclear power colourful lights

    New report proves there should be “no more new nuclear” in UK

    A report from the National Audit Office shows the extent of bad decision-making that enabled the Hinkley Point C nuclear deal.

  • Follow us


    Get our regular email newsletters, they contain the latest updates on our work as well as features and articles about environmental issues, science and politics.