house over lake new zealand

Law student sues New Zealand over climate change failings

A New Zealand law student is suing the country’s Minister for Climate Change over national emissions reduction targets.

In 2011, the Minister set an emissions reduction target of 50% of 1990 levels by 2050. But in 2015 the government, under the Paris Agreement, committed to reduce emissions by just 11% compared to 1990 levels by 2030.

ClientEarth legal expert Sophie Marjanac said: “This case could be ground-breaking, because the judges might need to consider the meaning of the overarching objective of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), which is to ensure the “stabilization of greenhouse gas concentrations on the atmosphere at a level that would prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference in the climate system”. Most importantly, they may have to pass judgment on what this means for developed countries’ emissions reductions targets. This would potentially set a global precedent and paint countries with weak targets in a very unflattering light.

New Zealand risks being exposed as having a woefully inadequate target, which is unlikely to be enough to meet the two degree temperature goal of the Paris Agreement. We are watching this case closely to see whether it could set a precedent for other developed countries, whose emissions-cutting targets also fail to meet what scientists say is required to prevent serious harm to the planet and humanity.”

Sarah Thomson claims the decisions regarding both targets were unlawful under the Act, on administrative grounds. Specifically, she alleges that, under the Climate Change Response Act 2002, the Minster was required to review the 2050 target after the release of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)’s 5th Assessment Report was released in 2014, and that both targets should be set in line with the objective of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.

The law student argues that under the Convention and the Paris Agreement, developed countries must significantly reduce their emissions to keep global warming below two degrees above pre-industrial levels. This is the level that scientists agree is necessary to avoid severe impacts on the environment and humanity, a fact that the Minister acknowledges in her defence.

The Minister denies that New Zealand’s target must be set at a higher level under the Act or Paris Agreement, and claims that New Zealand’s emissions reductions will have a limited impact on the global total, and the likelihood of meeting the 2 degree temperature goal. Sarah has enlisted expert evidence from former NASA scientists James Hansen and is being represented by a firm of experienced litigators. The hearing runs for three days.

Share this...
Share on Facebook! Tweet this! Share on LinkedIn! Email!


Related articles

More from

  • Golden Gate Bridge, San Fransisco

    New Californian climate lawsuit against ‘Big Oil’ filed

    Another lawsuit against ‘Big Oil’ for the effects of climate change has been filed in California. The cities of San Francisco and Oakland, on behalf of the people of California are suing BP, Chevron, ExxonMobil, ConocoPhillips and Royal Dutch Shell over the company’s contribution to current and projected impacts from sea level rise in California

  • vintage dashboard oil pressure gauge

    Dieselgate, two years on: diesels “worse for climate”, not just health

    Diesel cars emit more carbon over their lifetime than petrol vehicles, according to top transport policy group.

  • london eye

    Victory for UK environment as judge says cost rules must change

    Today’s victory means that claimants will no longer have to expose their private financial details in open court when applying for judicial review.

  • hurricane from space

    Extreme weather means more litigation risk for business and government

    With Hurricane Harvey battering Texas, a new report by ClientEarth warns that governments and business may be increasingly at risk of litigation for failing to prevent foreseeable climate-related harm to people and infrastructure.

  • Follow us


    Get our regular email newsletters, they contain the latest updates on our work as well as features and articles about environmental issues, science and politics.