Killer smog shows need for EU action on air pollution

Just in case you were enjoying this week’s unseasonably warm weather, I have some bad news for you. If you live in London, Brussels, or Paris you are breathing higher levels of air pollution than in Beijing.

During these spells of high pollution, more people will die from heart attacks and strokes and more people will be admitted to hospital with asthma and other breathing problems. Older people and those with pre-existing health problems are being advised to reduce physical activity or even stay indoors.

How are our capitals responding to the smog?

Having moved from London to Brussels at the end of last year it is interesting to see the difference in response. Here you can’t escape the “Grade 1” smog warnings, which are on the pages of virtually every newspaper and website and broadcast regularly on weather forecasts and news bulletins. Even the PA on the metro is warning passengers and encouraging them to leave their cars at home (in four different languages).

Crucially, the Belgian authorities are also taking emergency measures to try to cut levels of pollution. A blanket speed limit of 50km/h has been imposed in Brussels and free transport has been offered in nearby Wallonia. In Paris the authorities are similarly combining the stick of lower speed limits with the carrot of free public transport in an effort to cut traffic fumes. So why isn’t the same happening in London? It’s hard to dispel the feeling that lives are being put at risk because the British government doesn’t want to draw attention to its own failure to tackle pollution.

People need protection from air pollution

We need adequate smog warnings so that the vulnerable can protect themselves. Children, the elderly and those with pre-existing health conditions such as asthma, bronchitis and a history of heart attacks or stroke are at risk and need to be able to reduce their exposure. Emergency measures are needed so that local traffic fumes don’t make the situation worse.

However, this is only damage limitation. To stop these lethal smog events happening in the first place we also need to tackle pollution at source. Air pollution does not respect national boundaries: the current smog is a cocktail of gases and particles from industry, traffic and agriculture, which gathered in central Europe and is now circling around the continent and mixing with locally produced pollution.

No one country can hope to solve this problem alone, so the new package of EU air pollution directives currently on the table is essential to cut emissions and deliver better air quality. However, current proposals would put off any meaningful targets until 2030 and condemn us to decades of dirty air, ill health and early deaths. With less than two months to go until the elections to the European Parliament, we need MEPs who will lead the fight for clean air in Brussels.

In the meantime ClientEarth will continue to uphold the right to clean air in the courts – our case against the UK Government will be heard by the Court of Justice of the EU later this year.

Share this...
Share on Facebook! Tweet this! Share on LinkedIn! Email!

One thought on “Killer smog shows need for EU action on air pollution

  1. Terry

    I am part of a residents group, WatNext. Our small town (one of the smallest in the country) is plagued with traffic including HGVs despite having a 7.5 t weight limit. The lorries have difficulties negotiating the narrow roads and bends and cause traffic delays which in turn means our main town centre roads are part of an Air Quality Management Area. Despite measurements having been recorded for several years now the action by the South Oxfordshire District Council is minimal. We recently attended a workshop held by SODC and felt like we were being steered to approve what they were going to propose to DEFRA as the consultation document. We are meeting on Monday to give our group’s considered input to this document which we hope will be included when it is forwarded to DEFRA. If not then we will probably contact DEFRA ourselves. We however feel under qualified to have meaningful debate. We feel that more immediate solutions are possible but the authorities don’t seem to appreciate any urgency in addressing the problem. This post is partly in support of this article and your actions but also is a plea for help and suggestions and if possible advice about training.
    With thanks in anticipation,

Comments are closed.