Girl holding parents' hands to illustrate story saying Commission ignores UN rebuke on access to EU Court

Commission ignores UN rebuke on access to EU Court

The European Commission continues to block court access in environmental cases and has answered a UN committee rebuke with tired arguments that have already been dismissed.

In its latest response to the case brought by environmental lawyers ClientEarth, the Commission continued to claim that it provides access to the EU courts. This is clearly false, as no individual or campaign group has ever been given permission to bring an environmental case against an EU institution to the European Court of Justice.

ClientEarth senior lawyer Anaïs Berthier said: “The Commission has shown yet again that it is happy to breach law on EU access to the courts. It actively prevents court access for people who want to challenge environmental decisions of EU institutions, while denying there is a problem.”

The Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee (ACCC) is a UN body responsible for enforcing the Aarhus Convention on court access. In July this year, it confirmed that the EU is breaching the law.

The Committee found that the EU is violating the Convention. It also said that neither the jurisprudence of the EU Court, nor the regulation applying the Aarhus Convention, lets citizens bring environmental cases.

Berthier added: “The Commission challenges every point of the decision of the Compliance Committee. In its latest response, it repeated many arguments that have already been rejected by the ACCC.

“We brought this case in 2008. Eight years later, the EU is using delaying tactics to stall it even further. It is time for the Commission to honour the promise it made when it signed the Aarhus Convention. It is time to let citizens go to court to protect people and the planet.”

Read ClientEarth’s briefing: Draft findings of the Aarhus Compliance Committee show the EU is in violation of the access to justice provisions of the Aarhus Convention

Share this...
Share on Facebook! Tweet this! Share on LinkedIn! Email!

Related articles

More from

  • The challenge of challenging air quality programs in Poland – The Silesian air quality program and the issue of standing

    In February 2016, a resident of the town of Rybnik located in the region of Silesia, Poland, demanded that the Silesian Regional Assembly amend the air quality program it had adopted in 2014 for the region of Silesia.

  • Hinkley Point power station

    Case C-640/16 P, Greenpeace Energy v Commission, Judgment of 10 October 2017, ECLI:EU:C:2017:752

    The European Court of Justice has confirmed the inadmissibility of Greenpeace Energy’s application for annulment of the Commission’s decision approving State aid for the nuclear power plant, Hinkley Point C.

  • paris skyline

    Highest administrative court grants access to justice and upholds right to clean air in France

    On 11 July 2017, the Conseil d’État ordered the French government to produce plans to achieve air quality limit values in the shortest time possible.

  • European Parliament calls on the Commission to propose legislation on Access to Justice in Member States and the EU

    On 15 November, the European Parliament adopted Resolution 2017/2819 calling on the Commission to ensure better implementation of EU nature laws by proposing legislation on access to justice in Member States and the EU.

  • Follow us

    You can help

    Your support helps us use the law to protect your environment.