california beach

Carbon Majors to face court over rising sea levels in California

Three local governments in the US have launched legal claims against 20 fossil fuel companies, seeking a contribution to their costs of adapting to rising sea levels.

The case takes aim at the largest fossil fuel companies on the planet, known as carbon majors, including BP, Chevron Corporation, Exxon Mobil, Shell and Total.

The two coastal counties – San Mateo County, Marin County – and the City of Imperial Beach allege that greenhouse gas emissions from these companies between 1965 and 2015 will cause approximately 7.4 feet of global sea level rise in the future.

They argue that rising sea levels will put public and private property at risk and affect the rights of coastal residents in California to health, safety and peace.

ClientEarth law consultant Sophie Marjanac said: “This an unprecedented moment for climate change litigation. Multiple cases are being brought against Carbon Majors and governments worldwide.”

“Climate change has real impacts that put people, communities and their homes at risk. Lawyers are finding new and fresh ways to address these harms that have the potential to force Carbon Majors to pay for the damage their products have contributed to.”

Climate change litigation is starting to parallel the waves of cases brought against tobacco companies, which eventually turned the tide of public opinion against the industry.

This claim is the first in which local governments have sought costs from fossil fuel polluters to adapt to climate damages.

It is brought on grounds of public nuisance and negligence and – for the first time – product liability laws. These laws protect consumers by requiring sellers of dangerous products to provide a warning.

The counties argue that Carbon Majors have attempted to supress climate science to avoid regulation. Despite knowing the dangers of their products, their “oppressive, malicious and fraudulent” behaviour is in complete disregard for the rights of others.

They ask the court to order the fossil fuel companies to pay back what they have earned because of their wrongful conduct – known as a disgorgement of profits.

Share this...
Share on Facebook! Tweet this! Share on LinkedIn! Email!

Jules Miller

Related articles

More from

  • Golden Gate Bridge, San Fransisco

    New Californian climate lawsuit against ‘Big Oil’ filed

    Another lawsuit against ‘Big Oil’ for the effects of climate change has been filed in California. The cities of San Francisco and Oakland, on behalf of the people of California are suing BP, Chevron, ExxonMobil, ConocoPhillips and Royal Dutch Shell over the company’s contribution to current and projected impacts from sea level rise in California

  • vintage dashboard oil pressure gauge

    Dieselgate, two years on: diesels “worse for climate”, not just health

    Diesel cars emit more carbon over their lifetime than petrol vehicles, according to top transport policy group.

  • london eye

    Victory for UK environment as judge says cost rules must change

    Today’s victory means that claimants will no longer have to expose their private financial details in open court when applying for judicial review.

  • hurricane from space

    Extreme weather means more litigation risk for business and government

    With Hurricane Harvey battering Texas, a new report by ClientEarth warns that governments and business may be increasingly at risk of litigation for failing to prevent foreseeable climate-related harm to people and infrastructure.

  • Follow us


    Get our regular email newsletters, they contain the latest updates on our work as well as features and articles about environmental issues, science and politics.