ClientEarth and air pollution – what we do![]() photo: Leo Reynolds The UK and EU set legally binding limits on levels of harmful air pollution based on World Health Organisation (WHO) guidelines. One or more of these limits has been broken in London in every year since they came into effect in 2005. ClientEarth is working so that the law will protect peoples’ health from air pollution. We aim for the UK to achieve full compliance with air quality laws in London by the time of the Olympic Games in 2012. ClientEarth’s work focuses on ensuring that the UK government and the Mayor London to comply with legal limits for two pollutants: • Particulate matter (PM10)• Nitrogen dioxide (NO2) We are also working to ensure that disruption caused by the Olympics doesn’t make London’s air quality even worse. Nitrogen dioxide (NO2) Particulate matter (PM10) Read our press release ClientEarth’s work has meant that an extra £5 million of government money was found for cleaning up London’s air. We opposed the UK government’s application for a time extension to comply with limits for PM10 in London. This led to the European Commission rejecting the first time extension notification (TEN) and approving the resubmitted application only on the condition that further measures were taken to tackle the problem in the short term. This led to the Mayor of London being given a £5 million “Clean Air Fund” which is being used for dust suppression and retrofitting buses on London’s most polluted roads. While we welcome these measures, we aren’t convinced they will be sufficient to prevent further breaches of the air quality limits. We are now calling for the government to hold a public consultation on the amendment of the air quality plan, as required by law, so that the public is given a voice on the government’s plans. Letter to the European Commission: UK government ignoring guidance on complying with air pollution limits (PM10) – March 2011 The Olympics The Olympic Delivery Authority is legally required to produce a transport plan for the Olympic Games. Their own environmental assessment admitted that the disruption caused by the Olympics would make air quality worse, and could lead to even more breaches of the pollution limits.This could lead to fines from the European Court of Justice, and may even lead to the International Olympic Committee withholding revenue from the games: You can read our response to the consultation on the “strategic environmental assessment” of the Olympic Transport Plan here. Read these articles on The Guardian and the BBC website featuring ClientEarth lawyer Alan Andrews. For more information, look at ClientEarth’s press releases and our Health & environment publications page |







