European Union Aarhus Centre news, January 2012

This update is published every second month. It reports on Aarhus-related developments at EU-level. Contributions from all sides – public authorities, NGOs, private persons – are welcome as they help ensure greater transparency.

Access to justice under the Environmental Impact Assessment Directive and the Aarhus Convention

The European Court of Justice (ECJ) (joined cases C-177/09 to C-179/09 of 17 November 2011) was called by the Belgian Conseil d’Etat for a preliminary ruling to interpret the access to justice provision of Directive 85/337 on environmental impact assessments (EIA Directive). The provision allows decisions taken within an EIA and submitted to public participation to be challenged. The Court also interprets Articles 6 and 9 of the Aarhus Convention providing access to justice to the public in environmental matters. In all cases, the ECJ reiterates its findings adopted in joined cases C-128/09 to C-131/09, C-134/09 and C-135/09 Boxus, judgment of 18-10-2011.

Read more…

Cases T-120/10 and T-449/10 ClientEarth and Others v. Commission, Orders of the General Court of 9 November 2011

In two cases versus the Commission (T-120/10 and T-449/10 orders of the General Court of 9 November 2011), ClientEarth alongside other NGOs, the European Federation for Transport and Environment, the European Environment Bureau (EEB) and BirdLife International, applied to the Commission for access to a number of documents concerning biofuels. The Commission only granted partial access to the documents without justifying its refusal properly. Two cases were brought before the General court.

Read more…

European agency releases documents requested about pesticide guidance

In April 2011, ClientEarth and Pesticides Action Network Europe (PAN Europe) launched a case in the General Court of the European Union against the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) (case T-245/11). The case has been brought because EFSA is not being transparent about decisions that led to guidance on the interpretation of EU law applying to pesticides. EFSA’s guidance will allow pesticides used in agriculture to reach the EU market disregarding evidence from independent scientists.

Read more…

Spain escapes sanctions for the construction of oil refinery

In 2009, a Spanish environmental organisation introduced a complaint to the Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee, arguing that Spain had infringed several provisions of the Aarhus Convention with regard to the procedure of constructing an oil refinery in Extremadura (ACCC/2009/36). In July 2010, the Compliance Committee concluded that during the procedure Spain had disregarded several provisions of the Convention. In the same month, the NGO sent a complaint to the Commission, requesting the opening of an infringement procedure against Spain. The Commission registered the complaint, but closed it in January 2011. The NGO then turned to the European Ombudsman.

Read more…

Spain evades laws to protect urban waste water

In 2000, a Spanish citizen raised a complaint with the European Commission because the urban waste water in the municipality of Vera was not treated in compliance with Directive 91/271 concerning urban waste-water treatment. The Commission opened procedures against Spain which ended by a judgment of the Court of Justice of 8 September 2005 (C-416/02). The Court found that Spain was in breach of EU law, because the urban waste water in Vera did not undergo the necessary tertiary treatment and the zone of Rambla de Mojacar had not been declared sensitive area under Directive 91/271. As Spain did not take the necessary measures, the Commission started a new procedure under Article 260 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).

Read more…

European Parliament vote on access to documents

On 15 December 2011, the European Parliament adopted its first reading position within the review of Regulation 1049/2001 on access to documents. This has been a long time coming since the Commission first adopted its proposal in 2008. The Commission’s proposal restricts the scope of the right of access through different means. ClientEarth, Access Info Europe and Greenpeace, continue with their campaign, supported by 131 NGOs and a number of investigative journalists, and have welcomed the European Parliament vote.

Read more…

EU bodies fail to disseminate information through public registers

The Aarhus Centre has warned both the Commission and the European Investment Bank of failure to comply with their obligation to actively disseminate environmental information through public registers – as required by the Aarhus Convention, Regulation 1049/2001 on access to documents and Regulation 1367/2006 applying the Aarhus Convention to EU institutions and bodies.

Read more…

Share this...
Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInEmail to someone

Related articles

More from

  • Westminster bridge close up with parliament and big ben in background at sunset

    Brexit vote pledge heightens concern for environment laws

    The prospect of the UK Government ignoring parliamentary votes has heightened fears that laws protecting the natural environment may also be ignored.

  • Yellow sunset on grass on cliffs and sea

    Certainty on future environmental laws unclear in Brexit plan

    Theresa May has set out the government’s priorities for negotiations with Europe as the UK prepares to exit the European Union,

  • image of frost on thistles

    New UK rules make it harder to bring environmental court cases

    New rules in environmental court cases will have a chilling effect on the UK justice system, making it harder to bring cases like ClientEarth’s challenge to the UK government over cancer-causing air pollution.

  • Woman catching blossom for story saying UN committee finds the EU is violating access to justice law

    Draft findings of Compliance Committee – EU in violation of access to justice provisions of Aarhus Convention

    This document explains the decision of the Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee, in which it said that the EU was in violation of the Convention for not providing access to the Court of Justice of the EU to members of the public.

  • Explore our work

    Follow us


    Get our regular email newsletters, they contain the latest updates on our work as well as features and articles about environmental issues, science and politics.