
Image: Tech109
Daniela Rey, Climate and Forests Lawyer for ClientEarth, shares her views on what are the sticking points on the current REDD+ safeguards negotiations at Durban. Below are her recommendations for ensuring that the design of the Safeguards Information System (SIS) is transparent, participatory and accurate.
Last year in Cancun, the Parties to the UNFCCC agreed on a set of 7 safeguards to ensure that REDD+ activities do not adversely affect human rights and biodiversity and promote multiple benefits. In addition, a mandate was given to the Subsidiary Body for Scientific and Technological Advice (SBSTA) to provide guidance for the establishment of a Safeguards Information System (SIS), which would serve as means to ensure that the implementation of the REDD+ safeguards is monitored and reported on. Leading up to Durban and as we write this blog, Parties have been sharing their views with regards to the design of the REDD+ Safeguard Information System.
As the negotiations progress in Durban, there are several major issues being negotiated. These include: