Biodiversity offsetting policies raise more questions than answers

ClientEarth has raised concerns that ministers are proceeding with policies for wildlife protection that their own evidence has failed to prove are either effective or popular.

The UK Government has released a public consultation on new measures which would allow developers greater flexibility in meeting their legal obligation to avoid disturbing protected species.

Three of the four policies involve compensating for damage to species or habitats by replacing them elsewhere. The policies, although not named as such, follow some principles of biodiversity offsetting.

Recently released findings from six biodiversity offsetting pilot projects in England suggest that there are hugely significant questions that need to be answered before ministers should begin  to think about using these schemes for wildlife protection.

By using terms such as ‘wildlife licensing’ and ‘compensatory habitats’ the similarities to ‘biodiversity offsetting’  mean that the findings from the pilot projects must be applied to these new policies.

ClientEarth’s Economics and Law Researcher, Tom West said:

“The Government’s latest consultation contains offsetting in disguise. The Government needs to answer four crucial questions raised by the pilot projects before it proceeds. The main issues we have seen are a need for improvement on how the value of a habitat is calculated, uncertainty over the costs involved, and an unclear legal framework protecting the newly created areas over time. Another crucial question is whether nature can always be replaced like for like.”

ClientEarth will be answering the public consultation to highlight these concerns and remind the government that policies for wildlife protection need to be based on benefits to wildlife, not benefits to business.

Share this...
Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInEmail to someone

Peter Trimming

Related articles

More from

bees on big sunflowers

Canada proposes ban on toxic pesticide

This new proposal shows that evidence-based decision making, in the face of enormous pressure from the pesticide industry, is beginning to work.

Picture of kingfisher to illustrate story asking What happens to EU nature laws after Brexit?

What happens to EU nature laws after Brexit?

ClientEarth answers your questions on what happens to the EU nature laws after Brexit, under either a ‘soft’ or ‘hard’ exit from the European Union.

Singing Robin bird

EU tensions mount over nature law delay

The European Commission has failed to publish its findings following an in-depth review of EU nature laws by its consultants.


Commission takes UK to court over porpoise protection failure

The European Commission today announced it is taking the UK to court for failing to protect harbour porpoises.

Explore our work

Follow us


Get our regular email newsletters, they contain the latest updates on our work as well as features and articles about environmental issues, science and politics.